Use of laboratory tests in the emergency department of a hospital in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2024.v24n4.05Keywords:
Laboratory Test , Emergencies , Costs and Cost AnalysisAbstract
Objective: To describe the use of laboratory tests by medical staff assigned to the emergency department of a hospital in Mexico. Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from March to July 2022 with data from 351 users of an emergency department. A non-probability convenience sampling was used. The sample included medical records of individuals over 18 years of age, of both sexes, who had a laboratory report and received medical attention in the emergency department in the past seven days. Pregnant women, postpartum women and individuals in shock were excluded. The variables collected from the records included sex, age, diagnosis, admission shift, type of emergency, requested analytes, documentation of laboratory report in clinical notes, analysis of laboratory results, and initiation or modification of medical treatment based on the findings. Descriptive statistics were performed using frequencies and proportions for qualitative variables. Results: The most common reason for consultation was abdominal pain, found in 11.96 % of the reviewed medical records. The most frequently requested analytes were blood count (98 %), blood chemistry (97 %) and serum electrolytes (88 %). The laboratory results were not documented in the medical notes in 63.8 % of cases, not analyzed in 68.9 % and not used to guide medical treatment in 72.1 %. This resulted in an unjustified expenditure of 57,529.34 Mexican pesos on laboratory tests. Conclusions: In seven out of 10 medical records, the laboratory tests did not contribute to initiating or modifying medical treatments. Strategies are needed to promote the appropriate use of analytes, including measures such as supervision, training and feedback, among emergency department medical staff.
Downloads
References
Islas Cerón RG, Valencia Ortiz AI, Bustos Vázquez E, Ruvalcaba Ledezma JC, Reynoso Vázquez J. Asociación entre calidad de atención y el nivel de saturación del servicio de urgencias de un hospital de Hidalgo, México. JONNPR [Internet]. 2020;5(10):1163-78.
Franklin BJ, Li KY, Somand DM, Kocher KE, Kronick SL, Parekh VI, et al. Emergency department provider in triage: assessing site-specific rationale, operational feasibility, and financial impact. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open [Internet]. 2021;2(3):e12450.
González N, Quintana JM, Lacalle JR, Chic S, Maroto D. Evaluación del uso apropiado de procedimientos sanitarios mediante el método RAND: revisión de su aplicación en la literatura biomédica (19992004). Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2009;23(3):232-7.
Anguiano Velázquez TG, Granados Kraulles JA, Santiago Sánchez B, Nolasco Alonso N, López Bazán TF, Huato Andrade C, et al. Uso de estudios de laboratorio y gabinete en pacientes con dolor abdominal no traumático, en el servicio de urgencias. Rev Cuba Med [Internet]. 2022;61(3):e2694.
Ioannidis JPA. Appropriate vs clinically useful diagnostic tests. JAMA Intern Med [Internet]. 2013;173(17):1607-09.
Barba EJR. Utilización inapropiada del laboratorio clínico. Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab [Internet]. 2003;50(4):209-23.
Castañón-González JA, Barrientos-Fortes T, Polanco-González C. Reflexiones sobre el proceso de atención en los servicios de urgencias. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc [Internet]. 2016;54(3):376-9.
Hernández BJC, Serrano BOR. Consideraciones sobre la integración del laboratorio al método clínico. MediSur [Internet]. 2016;14(5):600-4.
Zhi M, Ding EL, Theisen-Toupal J, Whelan J, Arnaout R. The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15-year meta-analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2013;8(11):e78962.
Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E, et al. The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016;11(3):e0149856.
Ulibarrena J, Ramayo E, Camacho A, Valverde S, Ramírez F, Martínez S. Modelo de análisis del uso del laboratorio por los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios basado en el nivel de urgencia según clasificación del paciente por el sistema de triaje estructurado. Rev Lab Clin [Internet]. 2019;12(1):7-12.
Alfonso JA, Laucirica Hernández C, Mondejar Rodríguez J. El método clínico frente a las nuevas tecnologías. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2014;36(4):499-511.
Carnota LO. El costo en salud y la corresponsabilidad clínica desde un enfoque gerencial. Rev Cuba Salud Pública [Internet]. 2010;36(3):222-32.
Varner C. Emergency departments are in crisis now and for the foreseeable future. CMAJ [Internet]. 2023;195(24):E851-E2.
Leong-Nowell TA, Tamani L, Kaspar A. Access block and overcrowding at the emergency department at Tupua Tamasese Meaole Hospital in Samoa. Int J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2023;16(1):32.
Benítez-Arvizu G, Novelo-Garza B, Mendoza-Valdez AL, GalvánCervantes J, Morales-Rojas A. Gasto excesivo por uso inadecuado del laboratorio clínico. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc [Internet]. 2016;54(2):216-23.
Doi D, Vale RRD, Monteiro JMC, Plens GCM, Ferreira Junior M, Fonseca LAM, et al. Perception of usefulness of laboratory tests ordering by internal medicine residents in ambulatory setting: A single-center prospective cohort study. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16(5):e0250769.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM004-SSA3-2012, Del expediente clínico [Internet]. México: DOF; 2012. Disponible en: https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup. php?codigo=5272787Disponible en: detalle_popup.php?codigo=5272787 https://dof.gob.mx/nota_
León Ramentol CC, Rivero Fexas G, López Machado M, Rodríguez Socarrás IP. Uso irracional de las pruebas de laboratorio clínico por parte de los médicos de asistencia. MediSan [Internet]. 2015;19(11):1300-08.
Carbajales León AI, Acosta Valdés M, López Lastre G, Carbajales León E. Uso irracional de los análisis de urgencia. AMC [Internet]. 2002;6(2):192-79.
Fernández-Cantón S. El IMSS en Cifras. La demanda de servicios en urgencias, 2004. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc [Internet]. 2006;44(3):261-73.
Ayala-García R, Rodríguez-Malaver C. Visitas al servicio de emergencia, características de los pacientes atendidos. Interciencia Méd [Internet]. 2023;13(4):26-32.
Velázquez-Guzmán MA, Morales-Hernández AE, Fonseca-Carrillo I, Brugada-Yáñez A. Correlación clínica del triaje con el diagnóstico clínico de ingreso y egreso realizado en los pacientes que acuden al servicio médico de urgencias de un hospital privado. Med interna Méx [Internet]. 2017;33(4):466-75. 24. Hauser RG, Shirts BH. Do we now know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? An expanded systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. Am J Clin Pathol [Internet]. 2014;141(6):774-83.
Baird GS. The Choosing Wisely initiative and laboratory test stewardship. Diagnosis (Berl) [Internet]. 2019;6(1):15-23.
García-Fuertes D, Crespín-Crespín M, Villanueva-Fernández E, Rodríguez-Cubero A, Castro-Jiménez MC. Adherencia a los criterios de uso apropiado de la ecocardiografía, ¿podría mejorar nuestra práctica? Cardiocore [Internet]. 2015;50(2):63-70.
García-Raja A, Caballé-Martín I, Giménez-Marín A. Uso adecuado del laboratorio clínico: necesidad y tendencias. Rev Lab Clin [Internet]. 2008;1(2):75-82.
Troccoli HM. La clínica y el laboratorio. Med Interna (Caracas) [Internet]. 2016;32(1):28-36.
Alshekhabobakr HM, AlSaqatri SO, Rizk NM. Laboratory test utilization practices in Hamad Medical Corporation; role of laboratory supervisors and clinicians in improper test utilization; a descriptive pilot study. J Multidiscip Healthc [Internet]. 2022;15:413-29.
Kilpatrick ES, Holding S. Use of computer terminals on wards to access emergency test results: a retrospective audit. BMJ [Internet]. 2001;322(7294):1101–3.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Horizonte Médico (Lima)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Horizonte Médico (Lima) (Horiz. Med.) journal’s research outputs are published free of charge and are freely available to download under the open access model, aimed at disseminating works and experiences developed in biomedical and public health areas, both nationally and internationally, and promoting research in the different fields of human medicine. All manuscripts accepted and published in the journal are distributed free of charge under the terms of a Creative Commons license – Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).