Validation of the battery of instruments for the evaluation of psychosocial risk factors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2018.v18n1.09

Keywords:

Risk factors, Social Psychology, Psychometrics, Burnout

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to adapt and validate the results of the Batería de Instrumentos para la Evaluación de Factores de Riesgo Psicosocial (Battery of Instruments for the Evaluation of Psychosocial Risk Factors) developed by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia in 2010. Materials and methods: An instrumental study was conducted with a total of 478 workers who underwent an occupational medical examination from March to September 2014. The following analyses were performed: psychometric properties by judges’ criteria, validity by Aiken’s V coefficient, construct validity by exploratory factor analysis, and reliability and internal consistency by Cronbach’s Alpha. Results: In the content validity analysis using judges’ criteria, only items with V = 1 (p = 0.032) were considered, resulting in 108 items in the Inside-Work scale form A, 96 items in the Inside-Work scale form B, and 29 items in the Outside-Work scale. A higher-than-standard item homogeneity level (rit > 0.20), and adequate reliability and internal consistency levels were demonstrated by Cronbach’s Alpha in the Inside-Work scale form A, Inside-Work scale form B, Outside-Work scale and Stress scale. In the convergent validity analysis, statistical significant correlations were obtained in most of the dimensions between the Outside-Work scale and Stress scale, and the Inside-Work scale form A and Stress scale. Conclusions: Criteria validity and convergent validity were determined in the Inside-Work scale form A, Inside-Work scale form B and Outside-Work scale, with empiric evidence of measurements consistent with the psychosocial risk construct being found. Moreover, internal consistency coefficients were estimated, with adequate levels being obtained in the assessed dimensions, according to the minimum level suggested for the research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Oficina internacional del trabajo. Factores psicosociales en el trabajo: Naturaleza, incidencia y prevención [internet]. En Novena Reunion Ginebra: Ediciones Alfaomefa;1984. Disponible en: http://www.ergonomia.cl/eee/Noticias_anteriores/Entradas/2013/11/1_OIT_ OMS_Factores_Psicosociales_en_el_Trabajo.html

Milczarek M, Brun E, Houtman I, Goudswaard A, Evers M, Bovenkamp M, et al. Expert forecast on emerging psychosocial risks related to occupational safety and health. European agency for safety and health at work. Luxembourg: European Communities; 2007.

Meliá Navarro, J. ¿Cómo evaluar los riesgos psicosociales en la empresa? Metodologías, oportunidades y tendencias. En: IV Congreso Internacional de Prevención y Riesgos Laborales. Sevilla, España: Organización Iberoamericana de Seguridad Social; 2016

Blanch JM, Sahagún M, Cervantes G. Estructura factorial del cuestionario de condiciones de trabajo. Rev Psicol Trab Organ. 2010;26(3):175-89.Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1576-59622010000300002

Ramada-Rodilla JM, Serra-Pujadas C, Delclós-Clanchet GL. Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: revisión y recomendaciones metodológicas. Salud Públ Méx. 2013;55(1):57-66.Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342013000100009

Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Cultural adaptation of instruments utilized in occupational health. Rev Panam Salud Públ. 2002;11(2):109-11.Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11939113

Ministerio de la Protección Social. Batería de instrumentos para la evaluación de factores de riesgo psicosociales[[internet], Bogotá, Colombia: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. 2010. Disponible en: http://fondoriesgoslaborales.gov.co/Contenido/Default.aspx?Id=568

Villalobos G. Diseño de un sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica de factores de riesgo psicosocial en el trabajo. [Tesis doctoral]. La Habana, Cuba: Doctorado en Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública, Instituto Superior de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana; 2005

Charria V, Sarsosa K, Arenas F. Factores de riesgo psicosocial laboral: métodos e instrumentos de evaluación. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública 2011; 29(4): 380-391. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/120/12021522004.pdf

Arenas Ortiz F, Andrade Jaramillo V. Factores de riesgo psicosocial y compromiso (engagement) con el trabajo en una organización del sector salud de la ciudad de Cali, Colombia. Act Colom.Psicol. 2013;16(1):43-56. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/acp/v16n1/v16n1a05.pdf

Montero I, León OG. A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2007;7(3): 847-862. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33770318

Muñiz J. Teoría clásica de los test. 1a ed. Madrid, España: Ediciones Pirámide; 1994.387 p

Morales P. Medición de actitudes en Psicología y Educación. 3a ed. Madrid, España: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Comillas; 2006.653 p.

Published

2018-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Albarrán V, Geldres V, Paredes P, Ramirez O, Ruiz F, Palomino JC. Validation of the battery of instruments for the evaluation of psychosocial risk factors. Horiz Med [Internet]. 2018Mar.31 [cited 2025May2];18(1):59-67. Available from: https://www.horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontemed/article/view/708

Issue

Section

Original article