Rhinoplasty surgery with carved silicone nasal tip graft performed at a clinic in Lima, Peru, in 2022

Authors

  • Enrique Antonio Chau Ramos Clínica Internacional. Lima, Perú. Cirujano plástico, magíster en Cirugía Plástica y Reconstructiva, doctor en Medicina. Miembro titular de la Unidad de Cirugía Plástica de la Sociedad Peruana de Cirugía Plástica Reconstructiva. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-2614

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2024.v24n3.03

Keywords:

Nasal Surgical Procedures , Rhinoplasty , Nasal Cavity , Surgery, Plastic

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the stability of the nasal tip over time with the use of carved silicone among patients with nasal tip stability deficit, previous aesthetic rhinoplasty and manipulation of the nasal septum. Materials and methods: A descriptive, analytical, interventional study using the nasal tip stabilization reconstruction technique performed at a private clinic in the city of Lima, Peru, in 2022. The study included 22 cases of patients between the ages of 30 and 55 with tip instability, previous rhinoplasty and manipulated nasal septum, without comorbidities. The patients were evaluated in the first, third and sixth months and one year after the reconstruction and stabilization of the nasal tip. Non-probabilistic sampling was performed. No sample was used, since the total number of patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. All the participants underwent the surgical technique with carved silicone. Results: With the surgical technique using carved silicone, less bleeding and less bruising were observed. In the follow-up one year after surgery, the technique maintained similar characteristics over time, in both alignment and height of the nasal tip. One case of extrusion of the silicone sheet was evidenced as a complication following trauma caused by a patient's fall. Conclusions: Silicone is widely accepted as a material employed for facial contouring with extended use in rhinoplasty. Our study demonstrated that it provides long-lasting support for the nasal tip. It is a viable alternative in rhinoplasties that do not have autologous cartilage or where the use of costal cartilage is sought. Silicon, being a readily available synthetic material that is easily moldable and does not reabsorb, is a useful alternative that shortens operating time and maintains tip projection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lozano Ruiz EA, Malagón Hidalgo HO, Pérez Dosal MR. Revisión sistemática de modelos de entrenamiento en rinoplastia. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2019;45(3):285-94.

Abarca A, Naser Alfredo G, Pardo JJ. Aplicaciones de materiales aloplásticos en rinoplastia. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2010;70:259-64.

Morena Serna M, Barberá MT. Cirugía plástica y reconstructiva facial [Internet]. España: Ponencia Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico–Facial, 2012. Disponible en: https://seorl.net/PDF/ponencias%20oficiales/2012%20Cirug%C3%ADa%20pl%C3%A1stica%20y%20reconstructiva%20facial. pdf

Olsoff Pagovich PJ, Ochoa Gómez JR, Cedillo Ley MP, Valle Aguilar CF, Cárdenas Salomón CM. Reconstrucción nasal con materiales autólogos y alóplásicos. An Med (Mex) [Internet]. 2009;54(1):32-9.

Alvo A. Rinoplastía y rinoseptoplastia funcional: Mejorando la función nasal más allá de la cirugía del tabique y los cornetes nasales. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2020;80(3):360-6.

Vallarta-Rodriguez A, Chávez-Osorio FD, Rojas-García P, GonzálesAlvarado C, Vallarta-Compeán S. Rinoplastia funcional y estética, fusionando conceptos. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2018;44(4).

Canto Vidal B, Canto Vigil T. Rinoplastia en la nariz mestiza y negroide: una preocupación de todos. Medisur [Internet]. 2010;8(1):26-31.

Colombo C, Gutierrez A, Aponte C. Manejo de la proyección de la punta nasal con injerto autólogo tipo extensor septal caudal. Seguimiento a un año. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2018;44(4):363-75.

Soria JH, Conde GC, Tuero A, Cachay-Velásquez H. Abordaje de la punta nasal problemática. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2013;39(4):333-9.

Shubailat G. Secondary Rhinoplasty. IJPS [Internet]. 2008;41(3):80-7.

Frame JD. New concepts in nasal tip rhinoplasty. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am [Internet]. 2021;33(1):71-82.

Perkins S, Patel A. Endonasal suture techniques in tip rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am [Internet]. 2009;17(1):41-54.

Sabry H, Salem I, Ghozlan NA, Zedan AA. Evaluation of different techniques in management of secondary rhinoplasty cases. Clin Case Studi Rep [Internet]. 2020;3(1):1-4.

Casanueva FL. Injertos de punta nasal en rinoplastia primaria. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2016;76(1):21-30.

Deva A, Merten S, Chang L. Silicone in nasal augmentation rhinoplasty: a decade of clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 1998;102(4):1230-7.

Koen I, Kadir S. Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip projection and rotation. Arch Facial Plast Surg [Internet]. 2006;8(6):411-5.

Rohrich RJ, Kurkjian TJ, Hoxworth RE, Stephan PJ, Mojallal A. The effect of columellar strut graft on nasal tip position in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2012;130(4):926-32.

Gálvez Chávez JC. Rinoplastia abierta, experiencias en el Hospital Clínicoquirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras (1977-2005). Rev Cubana Cir [Internet]. 2005;44(4):12.

Canto VB, Viera DÁ, Aguilar CD, Aguilar Colina D, Mesa BR, Gil EO. Resultados de rinoplastia abierta en pacientes portadores de deformidades nasales. Medisur [Internet]. 2017;15(1):126-33.

Mottura A, Cremona P. Rinoplastia estética primaria cerrada. Revisiones durante tres años. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2020;46(3):283-9.

Turrubiates Calcaneo EM, Revilla Macías DA, Vera Domínguez J, Telles Galicia DM, Marín Méndez H, Gómez Brito E. Análisis costo-efectividad de la rinoplastia y rinoseptoplastia con anestesia local en el Hospital Central Militar. Rev Sanid Militar Mex [Internet]. 2009;63(2):47-55.

Erlich Mark A, Parhiscar A. Nasal Dorsal Augmentation with silicone implants. Facial Plast Surg [Internet]. 2003;19(4):325-30.

Jung DH, Kim BR, Choi JY, Rho YS, Park HJ, Han WW. Gross and pathologic analysis of long-term silicone implants inserted into the human body for augmentation rhinoplasty: 221 revision cases. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2007;19(7):1997-2003.

Farfán J, Cubillos J, Parentini F, Fernández F. Rinoplastia de preservación dorsal, una nueva filosofía: Experiencia en el Hospital Naval Almirante Nef. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2022;82(1):33-40.

Patel PN, Abdelwahab M, Most SP. A review and modification of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med [Internet]. 2020;22(2):71-9.

Lohuis PJFM, Hakim S, Duivesteijn W, Knobbe A, Tasman AJ. Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2013;132(6):913e-923e.

Lavareda-Santana MA, Verdezoto-Gaibor KJ. Reducción de base nasal con disección subperióstica de tercio medio en rinoplastia primaria. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2023;49(1):25-34.

Rodríguez-Camps S. Rinoplastia leporina en paciente adulto: reconstrucción base nasal. Caso clínico. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2021;47(4):383–8.

Mottura A, Cremona P. Rinoplastia estética primaria cerrada. Revisiones durante tres años. Cir plást iberolatinoam [Internet]. 2020;46(3):283–9.

Published

2024-09-19

How to Cite

1.
Chau Ramos EA. Rhinoplasty surgery with carved silicone nasal tip graft performed at a clinic in Lima, Peru, in 2022. Horiz Med [Internet]. 2024Sep.19 [cited 2025May2];24(3): e2384. Available from: https://www.horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontemed/article/view/2384

Issue

Section

Original article