Evaluation of healing in partial skin graft donor sites using a xenograft compared to a synthetic cellulose skin substitute

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2019.v19n3.04

Keywords:

Transplantation, Heterografts, Granulation tissue, Wound healing

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate healing in partial skin graft donor sites using a skin substitute compared to a xenograft in patients with different diseases requiring partial skin grafting. Materials and methods: This paper presents a report of 20 patients between 19 and 65 years from the Plastic Surgery Unit of the Hospital María Auxiliadora in Lima Metropolitan Area, Peru, between December 2017 and June 2018, where healing was evaluated in partial skin graft donor sites. An interventional, analytical, prospective and longitudinal study was conducted using a double-blind design to control possible biases. For the statistical significance analysis, nonparametric tests with a 95 % confidence interval were used. Results: Using a skin substitute, a better healing quality of donor sites of epithelialization was seen compared with xenografting. Both techniques were evaluated with the Vancouver scale, which considers five aspects (healing, vascularity, pigmentation, flexibility and height), out of which healing showed significant results (p<0.05). Estimation of the risk in the healing process according to the Cox proportional hazards model showed that H = 0.60 (95 % CI 0.46- 0.78), which indicates that the shortest healing time was found in the skin substitute group. Conclusions: Skin substitutes are an important alternative that favors the good quality of healing in donor sites. skin substitutes proved to be more effective than conventional xenografting when evaluated and compared using the Vancouver healing scale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rodríguez Villalonga L, Chirino Díaz L, García Pelegrí S, Borrás Migues M, Quiñones Castro M, Durán González S, et al. Fototerapia en el tratamiento de las zonas donantes del cuerpo humano para los injertos libres de piel. Rev Cubana Angiol Cir Vasc. 2008; 9(1): 1-9.

Mora-González R, Hernández-López AE, Polo-Soto SM. Estudio comparativo experimental entre xenoinjerto de dermis acelular humana desnaturalizada y xenoinjerto de esclera porcina desnaturalizada para evaluar la integración del injerto en defectos esclerales de espesor parcial. Rev Sanid Milit Méx. 2004; 58(2): 59-64.

ORSKIN-EPICITE: next generation wound dressing. [Internet]. 2018. Disponible en: https://www.qrskin.com/epicite-hydro-for-skin-graft-surgery/properties.html

López Delis A, Rodrigues Fleury Rosa SS, Narcizo de Souza PE, Carneiro MLB, Fleury Rosa MF, Lobo Macedo YC, et al. Characterization of the cicatrization process in diabetic foot ulcers based on the production of reactive oxygen species. J Diabetes Res. 2018; 1: 1-10.

Koudoukpo C, Atadokpèdé F, Abègbidi H, Assogba F, Akpadjan F, Dégboé B, et al. Évaluation clinique du délai de cicatrisation des lésions d'ulcère de Buruli de diamètre inférieur ou égal à 10 centimètres à pobè (Bénin). Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Dec; 142(12): S612.

Toniollo CL, Da Matta ES. Abordagem multidisciplinar na cicatrização de úlcera venosa crônica. BJSCR. 2015; 11(3): 12-6.

Vásquez GD, Fierro AL, Arellano MI, Tirado SA, Peniche Castellanos A. Estudio comparativo entre el uso de apósito hidrocoloide vs uso de tie-over para valorar el porcentaje de integración de los injertos cutáneos de espesor total. Dermatología Rev Mex. 2011; 55(4): 175-9.

Rapado Raneque M, Rodríguez Rodríguez A, Penich Covas C. Hydrogel wound dressing preparation at the laboratory scale by using electron beam and gamma radiation. Nucleus. 2013; 53: 24-31.

Casierra-Posada F, Guzmán JA. Efecto del portainjerto y del injerto intermedio sobre la calidad de fruta en mango (Mangifera indica L). Agron Colomb. 2009; 27(3): 367-74.

Paredes E, Castillo Fernández L, Gómez Beltrán O, Vargas Cruz V, Lasso Betancor CH, Granero Cendó R, et al. Nuestra experiencia en el manejo de quemaduras con apósito antimicrobiano de plata, carbón activo y tecnología Safetac®. Acta Pediatr Esp. 2013; 71(8): 165-71.

Zamora J. Regresión de Cox. Unidad de Bioestadística Clínica - IRYCIS [Internet]. 2013. Disponible en: https://ftp.hrc.es/pub/bioest/charlas/Analisis_de_Supervivencia_3.pdf

Quezada B, Ayala R, Yanez V. Uso de sustituto dérmico en niños con secuelas de quemaduras: tres casos clínicos. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2008; 80(2): 150-6.

Urbina G, Rider J. Manejo de heridas complejas con sustitutos dérmicos. Rev Chil Cir. 2016; 68(3): 245-9.

KCI Medical. V.A.C. Freedom®: El sistema portátil para la curación eficaz de heridas [Internet]. 2016. Disponible en: https://www.acelity.com/

Salem C, Pérez JA, Henning E, Uherek F, Schultz C, Butte JM, et al. Heridas: Conceptos generales. Cuad Cir. 2000; 14(3): 90-9.

Sosa-Serrano AFJ, Álvarez-Díaz CJ, Cuenca-Pardo J, Juárez- Aguilar E, Kuri-Harcuc W. Tratamiento de quemaduras de espesor total mediante autoinjertos mallados cubiertos con aloinjertos criopreservados de epidermis humana cultivada in vitro. Reporte de un caso. Cir Plast. 1999; 9(3): 126-9.

Published

2019-09-15

How to Cite

1.
Chau Ramos EA. Evaluation of healing in partial skin graft donor sites using a xenograft compared to a synthetic cellulose skin substitute. Horiz Med [Internet]. 2019Sep.15 [cited 2025May1];19(3):20-6. Available from: https://www.horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontemed/article/view/1070

Issue

Section

Original article